Preview Workflow

Viewing: F_W 4400W noltied : Techniques for Fisheries Management and Conservation - Writing Intensive

Last approved: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:15:13 GMT

Last edit: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:21:17 GMT

Proposal Type

Writing Intensive

Contact Information

ciscojo
Jonathan
Cisco
CiscoJo@missouri.edu
573/884-6221
Campus Writing Program
Are you submitting this proposal on behalf of an instructor?

Instructor for whom you are submitting proposal:
noltied
Douglas
Noltie
NoltieD@missouri.edu
573/882-9421
Fisheries & Wildlife Sciences
Subject Area’s Department Chair/Director:
ciscojo
Jonathan
Cisco
CiscoJo@missouri.edu
573/884-6221
Campus Writing Program

Term for Proposal

 
Fall 2016

Course Catalog Information

NAT R
Fisheries And Wildlife (F_W)
Fisheries And Wildlife
4400W
4
 
30
Techniques for Fisheries Management and Conservation - Writing Intensive
Introduction to techniques (field and analytical/quantitative) used by fisheries and conservation biologists. Fosters understanding of techniques uses, advantages, limitations biases, and data interpretation. Extended weekly field outings require chest waders and life jackets. Graded on A-F basis only.
 
Lecture/Standard with Laboratory & Discussion
A-F Only
 
 
 
BIO_SC 3650 and STAT 2530 or NAT_R 3110 and F_W 2700 or F_W 4300.

Instructor Information

noltied
Douglas
Noltie
NoltieD@missouri.edu
573/882-9421
Fisheries & Wildlife Sciences
(numbers only)
Tenured Associate Professor
302 ABNR
 
 

The Campus Writing Program conducts a two-day faculty workshop to assist with the design and implementation of your writing intensive course. Once your course proposal has been approved by the Campus Writing Program, you will receive information on time, date and location of the workshop.
Indicate below if additional instructors are planned, but specific individuals have not yet been chosen. Check all that apply
Associate Faculty Member
Briefly describe the qualifications of the known graduate instructors, or planned qualifications if graduate instructors are still to be selected, bearing in mind that graduate students teaching honors courses should be advanced students with a record of excellent teaching.
 

Honors Course Information

 
 
Answer the questions below as they would apply to one section. For all other sections, provide similar information in the Additional Sections Information box below.
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

Writing Intensive Course Information

This lecture/field/lab course introduces students to techniques used by aquatic biologists sampling, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, write-up and to issues pertinent to management and conservation decision-making. READINGS: Murphy Willis, Fisheries Techniques. EXAMS: Three in-class tests. ASSIGNMENTS: Five 10-pg. reports, two of which are revised from field labs. One two-page analysis from stream lab. Several in-class handouts from mini-presentations. One two-page literature summary natural history report. Two-page natural history literature summary. Five one-page mini-presentation handouts. Two-page stream survey report.
.
Face-to-face
Self paced?

8
8
Should this course be considered for funding?

Large Enrollment Courses:
 
 
 

Writing Intensive Assignments

Pages
All assignments
In this lecture/field-based course, students will sample aquatic environments, collect and analyze data, and write professional reports following the style of the Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (TAFS). Students will write five IMRD reports, each of which will be about 10 pages. Reports #2 and 4 will be revised. Report #1: Population Composition/Characteristics Report #2: Population Size Report #3: Water Quality and Habitat Report #4: Age and Growth Report #5: Diet and Prey Base
Length of assignment:
54
 
20
 
74

Total pages for all assignments:
First drafts:
54.00
Revisions:
20.00
74.00
 

Writing Intensive Teaching

Instructor provided feedback
Oral presentation by student, followed by feedback
Peer review
 
 
The discussion sections of each report require students to evaluate their findings in light of the biology/ecology of the system, in light of the methodologies employed, and in light of management practices. Specific questions are identified in the ‘Main Themes' part of each report. For example, the first report asks students to evaluate the pros/cons of different methodologies (seining, bottom-setting/sinking, gill netting, trap netting, backpack electroshocking, and boat electroshocking) on the basis of bias, selectivity, vulnerability, and effectiveness. The interpretation of data is something which reasonable people might disagree upon.
Less writing is done in the first third of the semester. However, reports are spaced evenly throughout the second two-thirds of the semester roughly every two weeks.
55
%
 
1
TA has already taken the course thus, the TA is intimately acquainted with the course, expectations, procedures, etc.

Course Syllabus

Upload Course Syllabus

Administrative Information

Natural and Applied Sciences
 
 

Acknowledgement

I have read and reviewed the updated proposal

Additional Comments

 
 
Key: 182