Preview Workflow

Viewing: jamesha : Ethical Issues in Agriculture - Writing Intensive

Last approved: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 21:04:17 GMT

Last edit: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 21:04:17 GMT

Proposal Type

Writing Intensive

Contact Information

jamesha
Harvey
James
HJames@missouri.edu
573/884-9682
Agricultural/Applied Economics
Are you submitting this proposal on behalf of an instructor?

Instructor for whom you are submitting proposal:
jamesha
Harvey
James
HJames@missouri.edu
573/884-9682
Agricultural/Applied Economics
Subject Area’s Department Chair/Director:
parcellj
Joseph
Parcell
ParcellJ@missouri.edu
573/882-0870
Agricultural/Applied Economics

Term for Proposal

 
Spring 2017

Course Catalog Information

CAFNR
Agricultural Economics (AG_EC)
Agricultural Economics
3241W
3
 
30
Ethical Issues in Agriculture - Writing Intensive
The study of how economics, philosophy, and science inform on and impact important ethical problems in agriculture, such as the environment, biotechnology, animal welfare, farm structure, the role of agribusiness, development, sustainability, and agriculture-related public policy. Course may be repeated once for credit.
Humanities
Lecture/Standard
A-F (allow student to choose S/U option)
AG_EC 1041 or ECONOM 1014 and junior standing.
 
 
 

Instructor Information

jamesha
Harvey
James
HJames@missouri.edu
573/884-9682
Agricultural/Applied Economics
(numbers only)
Tenured Professor
146 Mumford Hall
 
 

The Campus Writing Program conducts a two-day faculty workshop to assist with the design and implementation of your writing intensive course. Once your course proposal has been approved by the Campus Writing Program, you will receive information on time, date and location of the workshop.
Indicate below if additional instructors are planned, but specific individuals have not yet been chosen. Check all that apply

Briefly describe the qualifications of the known graduate instructors, or planned qualifications if graduate instructors are still to be selected, bearing in mind that graduate students teaching honors courses should be advanced students with a record of excellent teaching.
 

Honors Course Information

 
 
Answer the questions below as they would apply to one section. For all other sections, provide similar information in the Additional Sections Information box below.
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

Writing Intensive Course Information

In this course we examine ethical issues in agriculture, with particular emphasis on the development of an analytical framework for understanding and evaluating the ethical implications arising from agriculture-related public policy. We study ethical theories, show how economics, philosophy, and science inform on and impact important ethical problems, and consider how and where ethical considerations figure in the public policy process. We also study some of the classic literature in agricultural and applied ethics. Topics may include the use of technology in agriculture, food safety, environmental protection, poverty and economic development, animal welfare, farm structure, the role of agribusiness, business ethics, sustainability, and government agricultural programs. There is one group project in which student create a video documentary about an ethical issue of their choice. We watch the videos in class and students assess other videos (not their own group's) on interest and effectiveness. Student evaluations make up about half of the weight of the grade they receive (instructor and course TA also provide feedback and evaluation).
Teaching the course has consistently been a positive experience. Student evaluations are always good. I do not expect significant changes to the course, except adjustments to course topics as appropriate.
Face-to-face
Self paced?

48
50
Should this course be considered for funding?
Yes
Large Enrollment Courses:
 
 
 

Writing Intensive Assignments

Pages
All assignments
I require five 2-3 page writing assignments plus a final term paper of 4 to 8 pages in length. For each writing assignment, students may write as many drafts as needed to make the paper acceptable. Papers are graded first by a course TA (a Masters or Doctoral student) and then I read them. Papers that are not acceptable are returned to students with an invitation to revise. The final class paper allows no drafts - it is a one-shot writing project.
Length of assignment:
20
Course TA and instructor
15
Instructor
35

Total pages for all assignments:
First drafts:
20.00
Revisions:
15.00
35.00
 

Writing Intensive Teaching

Instructor provided feedback
Other
Peer review
The course TA corrects for proper English and provides some comments on content. I score papers on content and suggest changes needed to make papers acceptable. We discuss in class what makes an acceptable paper, and I provide individual oral feedback to students who request it. For one writing assignment (the second one on controversial technologies), I will have students discuss the feedback they received from me and the TA with others in a group and to get group suggestions on revising the paper.
 
Because this is an ethics class, virtually all writing assignments address issues for which there can be multiple interpretations and evaluations. I tell students I am less concerned about what their position or argument is and more concerned about the quality of their writing and their ability to construct and defend a sound argument. For this reason I grade on presentation grammar, typos, sentence structure, etc as well as content quality of the argument, accurate use of ethical theories, etc.
Writing assignments are distributed evenly during the semester.
40
%
Other grade requirements include attendance, brief quizzes on readings, a group project (students make a short video documentary), and a written final exam.
1
I select an advanced MS or PhD student from our graduate program who has strong writing skills and who has an interest in ethical issues. Usually these are students I advise, given my research focus on applied ethics. The course TA attends classes and helps with in-class activities as needed. The TA also gives a first reading of all writing assignments, noting and correcting problems with the presentation grammar, etc and providing an initial score of acceptable or not acceptable. For each assignment I explain to the TA its purpose and what to look for in terms of content. Because I read all writing assignments after the initial reading by the TA, I provide feedback on the quality of the initial assessments. Usually this is minor after the first couple of writing assignments.

Course Syllabus

Upload Course Syllabus

Administrative Information

Education and Social Sciences
 
 

Acknowledgement

I have read and reviewed the updated proposal

Additional Comments

 
Patricia Luckenotte (luckenottep) (Thu, 06 Oct 2016 22:00:00 GMT): I removed some bad symbols listed in the WI course overview
Patricia Luckenotte (luckenottep) (Fri, 04 Nov 2016 21:03:53 GMT): I have added AG_EC 3241W, 01 to the Spring 2017 Schedule of Classes and cancelled the regular section of AG_EC 3241, 01. The 45 students that were enrolled in the regular section have been moved to AG_EC 3241W.
Key: 8